Re: [Proftpd-user] mod_sftp vs sshd performance
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.proftpd.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10.05.19 08:22, [email protected] wrote: >Thanks TJ. I did try the 128 version w/o a major improvement. > >How difficult would it be to support that the missing cipher in proftpd for someone with moderate C ability? the problem is not in the cipher. The problem is that some systems have already disabled some ciphers, because they are not secure enough. >On May 9, 2019, at 4:13 PM, Sergei Gerasenko <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> On May 9, 2019, at 2:23 PM, TJ Saunders <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Thanks for the scriptlet. I think aes128-cbc is working comparatively >>>> well. Is arcfour not available for proftpd anymore? >>> >>> The arcfour128 and arcfour256 ciphers are available, but not enabled by default. You may need to explicitly enable them, via the SFTPCiphers directive: >>> >>> http://www.proftpd.org/docs/contrib/mod_sftp.html#SFTPCiphers <http://www.proftpd.org/docs/contrib/mod_sftp.html#SFTPCiphers> -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Linux is like a teepee: no Windows, no Gates and an apache inside... _______________________________________________ ProFTPD Users List <[email protected]> Unsubscribe problems? http://www.proftpd.org/list-unsub.html