Re: [Proftpd-user] mod_sftp vs sshd performance
Sergei Gerasenko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.proftpd.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It looks like ftps delivers stellar performance: I’m getting 900M/s vs 140M/s (the “poly" algorithm of sshd). I think I’ll go with that for now. > On May 10, 2019, at 8:22 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Thanks TJ. I did try the 128 version w/o a major improvement. > > How difficult would it be to support that the missing cipher in proftpd for someone with moderate C ability? > > On May 9, 2019, at 4:13 PM, Sergei Gerasenko <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> >> >>> On May 9, 2019, at 2:23 PM, TJ Saunders <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Thanks for the scriptlet. I think aes128-cbc is working comparatively >>>> well. Is arcfour not available for proftpd anymore? >>> >>> The arcfour128 and arcfour256 ciphers are available, but not enabled by default. You may need to explicitly enable them, via the SFTPCiphers directive: >>> >>> http://www.proftpd.org/docs/contrib/mod_sftp.html#SFTPCiphers <http://www.proftpd.org/docs/contrib/mod_sftp.html#SFTPCiphers> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> TJ >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ProFTPD Users List <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> Unsubscribe problems? >>> http://www.proftpd.org/list-unsub.html <http://www.proftpd.org/list-unsub.html> >> _______________________________________________ ProFTPD Users List <[email protected]> Unsubscribe problems? http://www.proftpd.org/list-unsub.html