Re: [Proftpd-user] Exceptional slowness and lost connections 1.3.6b vs 1.3.5e

>On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 10:00 AM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
><[email protected]> wrote:
>> this could be issue of mod_delay, try using "DelayEngine off"

On 17.12.19 09:56, Tony Stocker wrote:
>I implemented this statement and it did not change behavior.

OK.

>> Passive mode or port mode? Can be an ipv6 issue.
>
>Passive mode with a defined set of passive ports (64000-65000)

that should be enough

>> >The system in question is running CentOS 6.10 (Final) with the latest
>> >kernel, 2.6.32-754.24.3.el6.x86_64.
>>
>> quite old system. can be something with this system as long.
>
>System is still supported, doesn't EOL until next November. No issues
>with 1.3.5e, only with subsequent versions.

Subsequent versions may require features not available in centos 6.

>> can you try debugging? run proftpd interactively "proftpd -nd10"
>> and see the results..
>
>I've done this and ran the system for approximately ten (10) minutes
>capturing debug output. Should I sanitize and post it (it's
>approximately 10 MiB in size uncompressed)? Or is there something
>specific I should look for in the file and post?

if you can find the exact places where the delays happened, logs from there
would be good. if not, you could turn on debugging with DebugLevel in config
and when anyone reports issues, look for logs from that time.

Otherwise, I'm afraid nobody will dig through 10MiB file.


-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
10 GOTO 10 : REM (C) Bill Gates 1998, All Rights Reserved!


_______________________________________________
ProFTPD Users List   <[email protected]>
Unsubscribe problems?
http://www.proftpd.org/list-unsub.html