Re: Securing the data channel
Jeremy Kitchen <[email protected]> Mon, 28 Nov 2005 09:07:28 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.pureftpd.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | GreyStar Solutions |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday 25 November 2005 12:13 am, [email protected] wrote: > This seems to suggest that FTP-SSL *does* support encrypted data > channels, right? (Since it's connecting to another port for the > encrypted data channel.) Also, the protocol does, pure-ftpd does not. > ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4217.txt > > suggests the same. > > So is it possible to get a secure data channel using pure-ftpd? not currently, no. IMHO, if you want security, use scp/sftp. > If > not, can anyone suggest another easy-to-use (but featureful) FTP > server that supports encrypted data? (I guess if there's nothing else > out there, I'll resort to SFTP, which sucks since it has nothing in > terms of features.) i'm not sure if they support what you need, but vsftpd [1] and proftpd [2] are excellent alternatives to pure-ftpd. I believe vsftpd is more lightweight and simple, like pure-ftpd, whereas proftpd is the sendmail of ftp servers (although, proftpd has had quite a few less security problems, it has had some, pure- and vs- have not) -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ [email protected] In the beginning was The Word and The Word was Content-type: text/plain -- The Word of Bob.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDizlTyBTJv0gb9+IRAmtvAJ9xypl98WEHIpiqv4NVndrtgVKbqACgt0pv 5T7VgmPz21MGpewU0TSk7u8= =Pylx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----