Re: [pure-ftpd] Issues with GCP load balancing multi instance
Boris Astardzhiev <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:13:19 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.pureftpd.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAP=KkTyh=h6GysTmhQ5Do5=9FdsySKgRWo6tn7BVsrWV_YTU3A@mail.gmail.com> |
--000000000000820c95059f9100d1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello, Try this. Though it was rejected by maintainer it might help in you case. https://github.com/jedisct1/pure-ftpd/pull/146/commits/a3405795856be3f34b8dad2cda0a90c82451a5cf Let me know if it helps. Regards, Boris On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 6:03 PM Luca Gervasi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > i'm trying to configure pure-ftpd behind a load balancer on GCP. In my > setup, i want to configure load balancing on port 21, having 2 instances > with its own public ip to be used for passive ports. > So: you connect to a common address <mylb.organisation>:21, it > redistributes to the working instances, each of them then PASV to its own > ip and the ephemeral port configured. This is the configuration example: > On instance1: > PassivePortRange 60000 61000 > ForcePassiveIP <instance1IP> > > On instance2: > PassivePortRange 60000 61000 > ForcePassiveIP <instance1IP> > > And so far this works: > Status: Logged in > Status: Retrieving directory listing... > Command: PWD > Response: 257 "/" is your current location > Command: TYPE I > Response: 200 TYPE is now 8-bit binary > Command: PASV > Response: 227 Entering Passive Mode (InstanceIP1,234,246) > > Problem is that when it goes bind(), it uses the (and how the hell did it > get the ip?) load balancer ip: > 2251 bind(9, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(60553), > sin_addr=inet_addr("<LOADBALANCERIP>")}, 16) = 0 > 12251 alarm(120) = 240 > 12251 listen(9, 8 = 0 > 12251 sendto(3, "<95>Feb 27 14:44:05 pure-ftpd[12251]: ([email protected]) > [DEBUG] 227 Entering Passive Mode (<InstanceIP>,236,137)", 119, > MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) = 119 > 12251 write(6, "227 Entering Passive Mode (<InstanceIP>,236,137)\r\n", 50) > = 50 > > So when the client tries to connect to the server, it gets a RST after the > syn, even if the port is actually listening correctly. > > Is there a way to have pure-ftpd binding to 0.0.0.0 or its own ip during > the passive binding? > > Thanks! > > Luca > --000000000000820c95059f9100d1--