Re: [pure-ftpd] Issues with GCP load balancing multi instance
Luca Gervasi <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:23:23 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.pureftpd.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPJi5KO0UgroAvChuMzBgQ-jJn14jTEz88ScV-Uf0BJzAgQ5xQ@mail.gmail.com> |
--0000000000007b0a2c059f9124b4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, thanks! I think it would solve the problem tho i'm not allowed to put self compiled code on production, so this is pretty useless to me :( What about a specific switch that allows to either (a) bind to any (0.0.0.0) or (b) force bind to passiveip ip (so that it doesn't break previous code) ? Thanks Luca On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 5:13 PM Boris Astardzhiev < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > Try this. Though it was rejected by maintainer it might help in you case. > > https://github.com/jedisct1/pure-ftpd/pull/146/commits/a3405795856be3f34b8dad2cda0a90c82451a5cf > Let me know if it helps. > > Regards, > Boris > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 6:03 PM Luca Gervasi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > i'm trying to configure pure-ftpd behind a load balancer on GCP. In my > > setup, i want to configure load balancing on port 21, having 2 instances > > with its own public ip to be used for passive ports. > > So: you connect to a common address <mylb.organisation>:21, it > > redistributes to the working instances, each of them then PASV to its own > > ip and the ephemeral port configured. This is the configuration example: > > On instance1: > > PassivePortRange 60000 61000 > > ForcePassiveIP <instance1IP> > > > > On instance2: > > PassivePortRange 60000 61000 > > ForcePassiveIP <instance1IP> > > > > And so far this works: > > Status: Logged in > > Status: Retrieving directory listing... > > Command: PWD > > Response: 257 "/" is your current location > > Command: TYPE I > > Response: 200 TYPE is now 8-bit binary > > Command: PASV > > Response: 227 Entering Passive Mode (InstanceIP1,234,246) > > > > Problem is that when it goes bind(), it uses the (and how the hell did it > > get the ip?) load balancer ip: > > 2251 bind(9, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(60553), > > sin_addr=inet_addr("<LOADBALANCERIP>")}, 16) = 0 > > 12251 alarm(120) = 240 > > 12251 listen(9, 8 = 0 > > 12251 sendto(3, "<95>Feb 27 14:44:05 pure-ftpd[12251]: ([email protected] > ) > > [DEBUG] 227 Entering Passive Mode (<InstanceIP>,236,137)", 119, > > MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) = 119 > > 12251 write(6, "227 Entering Passive Mode (<InstanceIP>,236,137)\r\n", > 50) > > = 50 > > > > So when the client tries to connect to the server, it gets a RST after > the > > syn, even if the port is actually listening correctly. > > > > Is there a way to have pure-ftpd binding to 0.0.0.0 or its own ip during > > the passive binding? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Luca > > > --0000000000007b0a2c059f9124b4--