[quagga-users 14565] Trouble distributing 0.0.0.0/1 route through RIP

"Jim C." <jim-u6mqxgY/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.quagga.user
Organization Carroll-Net, Inc.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
We have two routers connecting a LAN to two upstream ISP's. We'd like to
distribute default routes into RIP in such away that LAN user's prefer a
specific router.

 

On ROUTER-1 (the preferred router) we have:

 

    router rip

        version 2

        network eth3

        redistribute static

    ! Default to preferred upstream

    ip route 0.0.0.0/1 192.168.1.1

    ip route 128.0.0.0/1 192.168.1.1

 

On ROUTER-2 we have:

 

    router rip

        version 2

        network eth3

        redistribute static

    ! Default to backup upstream

    ip route 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.2.1

 

Using tcpdump, we can confirm that ROUTER-1 is advertising the two routes
into RIP. But examining the routing table on ROUTER-2 shows the following

 

    ROUTER-2> show ip route

    Codes: K - kernel route, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP

           O - OSPF, I - IS-IS, B - BGP, A - Babel

           > - selected route, * - FIB route

 

    S>* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 192.168.2.1, eth2

    R>* 128.0.0.0/1 [120/2] via 192.168.3.2, eth3, 00:00:03

 

It appears ROUTER-2 accepted 128.0.0.0/1 but did not accept 0.0.0.0/1. Can
anyone shed light on why this might be ?

 

If it's relevant, we are running Debian Jessie, Quagga 0.99.23.1

 

Thanks

Jim C.

_______________________________________________
Quagga-users mailing list
Quagga-users-UOy77sIEA+cAd7ICUelF/[email protected]
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-users
smime.p7s (application/pkcs7-signature, 4.6 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.