Re: SeamlessRDP License History
Nathan Kidd <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.rdesktop.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10-06-17 05:02 PM, Peter Åstrand wrote: >> Does anyone know about the license for these particular bits? > > The license statement on the tswindowclipper page says: > > "This article has no explicit license attached to it but may contain > usage terms in the article text or the download files themselves. If in > doubt please contact the author via the discussion board below. Precisely. That is boilerplate text added to every article on CodeProject when a license has not been specified. > A list of licenses authors might use can be found here" > > The list of valid licenses includes for example GPLv3. "might use", again part of the boilerplate text. It isn't saying the author specified a license, it is merely noting that he *could* choose one. None of the TSWindowClipper source has a license specified, not even proper copyright statement. If there's no other info about the license available then it looks like I should try to contact Martin Wickett and see if he would explicitly license under a GPL (or barring that, GPL compatible) license. > Are you considering distributing the Server EXE or Client DLL? The > Tokenizer code is only used in the Client DLL, which we are not > distributing. I'm not even sure it works nowadays. I was just thinking of the exe, so good point, no need to think about Tokenizer. Thanks, -Nathan P.S. Unrelated Rant: SourceForge's 30-minute mail delivery delay reminds me why Mesa just moved their lists to fd.o. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo