+C cmode vs. founder vs. split servers

Juraj Ziegler <next-/qz1p9rLzHHtwjQa/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.silc.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi all.

I'm not sure if it is a bug or a feature :)

Some two weeks ago, me and my friends were experimenting with the +C channel
mode. I created the channel, set it to +psf. Later I set it to +C and put some
10-13 public keys to the list (typing the whole path to keyfile is tiresome
:). When people tried to join, only the first one on the list succeeded. It
did not work for others. Also, only I could see all the keys on the list,
Other on the channel, +o but not +f, could see only one key.

However, that is not what bothers me most. What bothers me is, after some
server splitting cca. a week ago, even I, founder of the channel, cannot join
it and set it to -C. I am not sure if I put myself to the +C list, probably
not. Did anyone consider, whether to override the list for founders? It sure
would be practical for me in this situation :).

It happened to me more times, that after a server-connection problems,
silc-client indicated that I am joined to a channel (the status bar looked
like that),  but in reality, I had to joing the channel again to really be
there.

TIA for any explanation or help on getting my channel back :).

For the record, the channel name is 'strahov', my nick on silcnet is 'nxt'.

j.

-- 
______________________________________________________________________________
"We did a risk management review.  We concluded that there was no risk of any 
management." -- Dilbert
:wq

_______________________________________________________________
Info:    https://lists.silcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/silc-users
Archive: https://lists.silcnet.org/pipermail/silc-users
FAQ:     http://silcnet.org/support/faq/
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBW8cHWGpO+XKsHY8RApP/AKC5UShV7wud56Xy4ZZH+ZwKSLozrACfYMHE
XT0zdbFBIzCv/zA0qzuM2zY=
=HzGj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.