Re: slrn 1.0 [2007-08-25]?

On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 03:57:37PM +0000, Marcin Wiśniewski wrote:

>>> Meanwhile, here's yet another thought: can somebody be found to
>>> compile a Windows binary?

>> Cygwin should be sufficient and more easy. Native Windows support is
>> not necessary (nor desirable) since Cygwin is available for
>> everybody.

> Native Windows support is necessary (and desirable) since no one is so
> desperate to use hundred megabytes Cygwin to launch one mega big slrn.
> With all annoyances of Cygwin.

I have no problems with that. But should/must that be done in the
official source tree?



Bernd

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/