Re: detecting followups to own posts
Martin Trautmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.slrn.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sven Guckes wrote: > * Patrick Shanahan <[email protected]> [2007-10-31 16:16]: >> * Sven Guckes <[email protected]> [10-31-07 08:00]: >>> ps: adjust.. the.. subject.. dammit! >> AND *break* the thread :*) > > Mutt 1.5.16: ~/Mail.IN/SLRN (threads) [525/525] [NEW=105] > 523 r L Oct 31 Martin Trautmann ( 28) RE: status of slrn > 524 F Oct 31 To SLRN Users ( 16) `->Re: detecting followups to own posts > 525 L Oct 31 Patrick Shanahan ( 27) `-> > > i dont see anything broken here. ;) Where's "detecting followups to own posts" since yours is a "Re" to this subject? ;-) > as for detecting followups: generate your own IDs - > this makes it pretty easy to detect followups to > your own posts. Did you READ before complaining about subjects? It's easy for me to detect followups to my posts as soon as I am within the group. My scoring does work perfectly here. Either you did not understand my wish since your new subject may name something different or I do miss something obvious. My subject is "Which group does contain *new* followups to my posts" > and you can use google groups > with their notification to tell you about such > followups via email not perfect, but easy. :) Ouch - you do suggest google to be superior to a dedicated news reader? Is it that bad by now? I should buy google shares... Yes, google is not perfect. I do not need extra mails while I will visit the news anyway - I just prefer some indicator which group to read first. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/