Re: detecting followups to own posts
Patrick Shanahan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.slrn.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | Ptilopteri in Pandemonium |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 * Sven Guckes <[email protected]> [10-31-07 13:41]: > * Patrick Shanahan <[email protected]> [2007-10-31 16:16]: > > > > AND *break* the thread :*) > > Mutt 1.5.16: ~/Mail.IN/SLRN (threads) [525/525] [NEW=105] > 523 r L Oct 31 Martin Trautmann ( 28) RE: status of slrn > 524 F Oct 31 To SLRN Users ( 16) `->Re: detecting followups to own posts > 525 L Oct 31 Patrick Shanahan ( 27) `-> > > i dont see anything broken here. ;) not broken, should be broken, break the thread as it says, not *do* break the thread, break the thread, start a *new* thread. > > References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > > In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> > > the subject does not matter for threading - > In-Reply-To and References do! feature. agreed for non-broken clients, but... > as for detecting followups: generate your own IDs - this makes it > pretty easy to detect followups to your own posts. and you can use > google groups with their notification to tell you about such followups > via email not perfect, but easy. :) you mean that this is not a standard action? - -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn4472 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHKNMMClSjbQz1U5oRAuP+AJ0aS0DRbnfZ9UOdfOzODt22TrASKwCgq7sN DcMAu3okDMCWOlmFscNtWog= =2pZG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/