Re: score-color patch and 0.99x slrn -> subversion?!
Alex Chiang <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.slrn.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* Sven Guckes <[email protected]>: > * Rudy Taraschi <[email protected]> [2007-11-06 11:32]: > > > > I've put up a new version of my score color patch against > > pre0.9.9-43 for anyone that wants to play around with it. > > It's up at the usual place: http://www.taraschi.net/slrn > > well.. isnt there a subversion repository now? > frankly, i am pretty fed up with merging > all those different sources manually. How about using a modern source control system, like git? It's good enough for the Linux kernel... And after using it for a bit, I think it's actually pretty easy. > so... how will the work on slrn proceed? > who gets commit access to the repository? No "commit politics" with git. If you want to maintain an interesting patch / patchset, you just do so and publish your tree. If upstream (JED) wants it, he just pulls from your tree. If he doesn't, then you have the extra burden of maintaining your patchset against upstream (but the tool makes it pretty easy to merge), and interested users can always pull from you. Just a thought. /ac ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/