Re: score-color patch and 0.99x slrn -> subversion?!
Faheem Mitha <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.slrn.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Alex Chiang wrote: > * Sven Guckes <[email protected]>: >> * Rudy Taraschi <[email protected]> [2007-11-06 11:32]: >>> >>> I've put up a new version of my score color patch against >>> pre0.9.9-43 for anyone that wants to play around with it. >>> It's up at the usual place: http://www.taraschi.net/slrn >> >> well.. isnt there a subversion repository now? >> frankly, i am pretty fed up with merging >> all those different sources manually. > > How about using a modern source control system, like git? It's > good enough for the Linux kernel... > > And after using it for a bit, I think it's actually pretty easy. > >> so... how will the work on slrn proceed? >> who gets commit access to the repository? > > No "commit politics" with git. If you want to maintain an > interesting patch / patchset, you just do so and publish your > tree. > > If upstream (JED) wants it, he just pulls from your tree. If he > doesn't, then you have the extra burden of maintaining your > patchset against upstream (but the tool makes it pretty easy to > merge), and interested users can always pull from you. > > Just a thought. Mercurial is nice too. That is what I use. Faheem. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/