Re: Threading questions
"Rudy Taraschi" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.slrn.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Peter J Ross wrote: > In both cases, the extra "+" at the top of the tree indicates that the > articles are both children (or later descendants), not parent and child.The > graphical tree would display a downwards hook instead of "+". > > In Case 2, the solution is to set new_subject_breaks_threads to 2 instead of > 0. Thanks. I didn't know new_subject_breaks_threads accepted anything other than 0 or 1 until I RTFM, which essentially exactly answers my question. Setting it to 2 does what I wanted (or thought I wanted). I now have "strict" threading, but in some groups, I notice very broken threading due to malformed posts, enough to make it annoying. I may have to go back to 0; will know after the weekend when rec.arts.sf.written piles on a few hundred posts. Cheers! /rudy ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace