Re: Article 10998is unavailable.
Martin Trautmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.slrn.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Peter J Ross wrote: >> 2) A posting should not be marked as "D" (read) als long as it was not >> available. > > Hmm. It makes sense for me that an article deleted on the server should be > marked deleted in the client. It depends - is it not yet available? Is it unavailable temporarily? Is it no longer available? If it would no longer be available, it would not be listed at all - so I do not see any reason why it would have to be deleted. However, if it would have to be deletet, it would be much more reasonable to move to the next posting automatically. Since the current behavior is to stay at the article which is unvailable, I feel it should not become marked as deleted - even if the reason is not the malfunction of my news server, who lies, claiming it was unavailable. - Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/