Re: Fixes for java implementation
John Schultz <[email protected]> Mon, 7 Oct 2013 15:22:44 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.spread.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I have no problem disabling Nagle's algorithm. We already always do that on the C side, and probably should do the same on the Java side. On adding generics, I'd rather keep backwards compatibility if all it does is get rid of some warnings. Cheers! ----- John Lane Schultz Spread Concepts LLC Cell: 443 838 2200 On Oct 7, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Johannes Wienke wrote: Sorry for asking, has anyone noticed this message? Would be nice to get some feedback, especially on the tcpnodelay issue. Kind regards, Johannes On 27.08.13 11:22 schrieb Johannes Wienke: > Hi, > > we have maintained some patches for the spread java implementation for > some time in our system and I would like to contribute them back. > > After updating them to version 4.3 two issues have remained: > > 1. We have added a method to set the tcpnodelay option on the > SpreadConnection to speed up sending of small messages. > > 2. Since java 1.5 is out for some time now a second patch adds generics > to avoid compiler warnings. > > The first patch is an absolute necessity in our system and we would be > glad if you could apply it. For the second patch you have to decide > whether compatibility with java 1.4 is still required or not. > > Kind regards, > Johannes > > > > _______________________________________________ > Spread-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users > _______________________________________________ Spread-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users