Re: Fixes for java implementation
Johannes Wienke <[email protected]> Mon, 07 Oct 2013 21:29:26 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.spread.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 07.10.13 21:22 schrieb John Schultz: > I have no problem disabling Nagle's algorithm. We already always do that on the C side, and probably should do the same on the Java side. > > On adding generics, I'd rather keep backwards compatibility if all it does is get rid of some warnings. Thanks for the feedback. We would be glad to see nagle's algorithm disabled in the main release. The warnings are of course optional. Cheers, Johannes _______________________________________________ Spread-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.spread.org/mailman/listinfo/spread-users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 260 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlJTC5kACgkQBFcR5UV/ccKrpACggwFj5/d79wIEVy6iQDiMfn7j 1yIAoIvF0ftsCfxhe8ilq0jwlsG5HqQk =hA2W -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----