Re: Any cygwin builds with the HPN-SSH patch?
Mike <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:57:21 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.ssh.windows |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--0-1019924967-1203022641=:38037 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I found this message helpful for determining encryption and compression settings: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.misc/msg/c09a5ff96735f016 ----- Original Message ---- From: Alan Vinh <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 8:24:42 AM Subject: Re: Any cygwin builds with the HPN-SSH patch? I'm interested in the same solution, i.e., is there a way to move big files via ssh? sftp and scp are much slower than plain ftp due to the encryption involved (ftp is already slow without the encryption involved for ssh). Does anyone have a solution for moving large files using encryption such as going through SSH with decent speed? Thanks. Mike wrote: It is dead. Try copssh instead. ----- Original Message ---- From: "Doyle, Keith" <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 3:39:41 PM Subject: Any cygwin builds with the HPN-SSH patch? Slashdot just ratcheted up the visibility of the HPN-SSH patch which is sorely needed as SCP/SFTP on WIndows using the SSHWindows port is REALLY slow-- a 1G file transfer over a 1G network using FTP is taking about 1:12 and an SFTP of same is taking 12:35, and SCP 10:50. We can't use it as is, we're trying to do the ETL for a data warehouse product that is taking most of the night as it is, and multiplying the transfer time x10 to go from FTP to SFTP just won't cut it. I spotted some sites with info on using an ssh tunnel with netcat for transfers so that I can try blowfish or AES to squeeze a little more out of it, but I have a feeling it won't be enough. Any chance anyone is working on a build of SSHWindows that includes the HPN-SSH patch? http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/ <http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/> The SSHWindows packaging is real convenient, but since the last news on it is from 2004 it's looking kinda dead... -- Sync -- List Info: http://erdelynet.com/ssh-l/ List Archives: http://erdelynet.com/archive/ssh-l/ To Unsubscribe: Mail mailto:[email protected] Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. -- List Info: http://erdelynet.com/ssh-l/ List Archives: http://erdelynet.com/archive/ssh-l/ To Unsubscribe: Mail mailto:[email protected] ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping --0-1019924967-1203022641=:38037 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii <html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:courier,monaco,monospace,sans-serif;font-size:12pt"><div style="font-family: courier,monaco,monospace,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">I found this message helpful for determining encryption and compression settings:<br><span><a target="_blank" href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.misc/msg/c09a5ff96735f016">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.misc/msg/c09a5ff96735f016</a></span><br><br><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">----- Original Message ----<br>From: Alan Vinh <[email protected]><br>To: [email protected]<br>Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 8:24:42 AM<br>Subject: Re: Any cygwin builds with the HPN-SSH patc h?<br><br> <font size="+1">I'm interested in the same solution, i.e., is there a way to move big files via ssh? sftp and scp are much slower than plain ftp due to the encryption involved (ftp is already slow without the encryption involved for ssh). Does anyone have a solution for moving large files using encryption such as going through SSH with decent speed?<br> <br> Thanks.<br> </font><br> Mike wrote: <blockquote type="cite"> <div style="font-family: courier,monaco,monospace,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div style="font-family: courier,monaco,monospace,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">It is dead. Try copssh instead.<br> <br> <div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">----- Original Message ----<br> From: "Doyle, Keith" <a rel="nofollow" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" ymailto="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank" href="mailto:[email protected]"><[email protected]></a><br> To: <a rel="nofollow" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" ymailto="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank" href="mailto:[email protected]">"[email protected]"</a> <a rel="nofollow" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" ymailto="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank" href="mailto:[email protected]"><[email protected]></a><br> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 3:39:41 PM<br> Subject: Any cygwin builds with the HPN-SSH patch?<br> <br> <br> Slashdot just ratcheted up the visibility of the HPN-SSH patch which is<br> sorely needed as SCP/SFTP on WIndows using the SSHWindows port is REALLY<br> slow-- a 1G file transfer over a 1G network using FTP is taking about 1:12<br> and an SFTP of same is taking 12:35, and SCP 10:50. We can't use it as is,<br> we're trying to do the ETL for a data warehouse product that is taking most<br> of the night as it is, and multiplying the transfer time x10 to go from FTP<br> to SFTP just won't cut it. I spotted some sites with info on using an ssh<br> tunnel with netcat for transfers so that I can try blowfish or AES to<br> squeeze a little more out of it, but I have a feeling it won't be enough. <br> <br> Any chance anyone is working on a build of SSHWindows that includes the<br> HPN-SSH patch? <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/">http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/</a><br> <<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/">http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/</a>> <br> The SSHWindows packaging is real convenient, but since the last news on it<br> is from 2004 it's looking kinda dead...<br> <br> <br> --<br> <br> Sync<br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> --<br> List Info: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://erdelynet.com/ssh-l/">http://erdelynet.com/ssh-l/</a><br> List Archives: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://erdelynet.com/archive/ssh-l/">http://erdelynet.com/archive/ssh-l/</a><br> To Unsubscribe: Mail <a rel="nofollow" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" ymailto="mailto:ssh+" target="_blank" href="mailto:ssh+">mailto:ssh+</a><a rel="nofollow" ymailto="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank" href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br> <br> <br> </div> <br> </div> </div> <br> <hr size="1">Never miss a thing. <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51438/*http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs"> Make Yahoo your homepage.</a> </blockquote> -- List Info: <a target="_blank" href="http://erdelynet.com/ssh-l/">http://erdelynet.com/ssh-l/</a> List Archives: <a target="_blank" href="http://erdelynet.com/archive/ssh-l/">http://erdelynet.com/archive/ssh-l/</a> To Unsubscribe: Mail mailto:[email protected] </div><br></div></div><br> <hr size=1>Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ "> Try it now.</a></body></html> --0-1019924967-1203022641=:38037-- -- List Info: http://erdelynet.com/ssh-l/ List Archives: http://erdelynet.com/archive/ssh-l/ To Unsubscribe: Mail mailto:[email protected]