Re: Worrisome trend in syndication content

"Dave Winer" <dave-rH/ioLL7x7RWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.syndication.discuss
Message-ID <01d101c3475a$a397f720$3600040a@VAIO>
Imagine my surprise when I found that pointer led to my site.

I think Mark has stopped running his app, which would be a good thing.

I also have asked for guidance from some of the lawyers I work with. They
are very interested in this issue, and were interested before this came up.
Here's a citation:

http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2003/04/07

John is the executive director at Berkman.

Dave


----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug" <doug.ransom-cmaem7PIVQRoiclzN/[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 6:53 PM
Subject: [syndication] Worrisome trend in syndication content


> A popular blogger has expressed concern about services or agents which
> syndicate their content:  http://tinyurl.com/glqg
>
> Is this going to be a problem now?  How are agents to tell what
> content they may or may not syndicate?  With RSS 1, do agents need to
> examine the license information and interpret it?  With RSS 2, can
> agents really be expected to intrepret non-rdf metadata to figure this
> stuff out?
>
> I hope for new syndication formats like echo, the act of providing an
> feed is considered granting free license to syndicate content.  IMO if
> you put content on the web, people are free to quote it, mark it up,
> cache it, etc.  But that is a moral position;  I don't know what the
> law s say.
>
> Doug
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.