Re: Worrisome trend in syndication content
"Dave Winer" <dave-rH/ioLL7x7RWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.syndication.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <01d101c3475a$a397f720$3600040a@VAIO> |
Imagine my surprise when I found that pointer led to my site. I think Mark has stopped running his app, which would be a good thing. I also have asked for guidance from some of the lawyers I work with. They are very interested in this issue, and were interested before this came up. Here's a citation: http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2003/04/07 John is the executive director at Berkman. Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug" <doug.ransom-cmaem7PIVQRoiclzN/[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 6:53 PM Subject: [syndication] Worrisome trend in syndication content > A popular blogger has expressed concern about services or agents which > syndicate their content: http://tinyurl.com/glqg > > Is this going to be a problem now? How are agents to tell what > content they may or may not syndicate? With RSS 1, do agents need to > examine the license information and interpret it? With RSS 2, can > agents really be expected to intrepret non-rdf metadata to figure this > stuff out? > > I hope for new syndication formats like echo, the act of providing an > feed is considered granting free license to syndicate content. IMO if > you put content on the web, people are free to quote it, mark it up, > cache it, etc. But that is a moral position; I don't know what the > law s say. > > Doug > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/