Re: Re: My take on shared feed lists

Mark Fletcher <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.syndication.discuss
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Sam Ruby wrote:

><link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="RSS" 
>href="http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/index.rdf">
>
>On that page is lots of orange XML buttons.  Three of which actually are 
>related to Jeremy's site.  All three are valid RSS.  One of which 
>contains full posts, the others merely contain summaries.
>
>It would be nice if a person who knows nothing about directory or feed 
>formats could be presented with the option to chose between full format 
>and summary when they say they want to subscribe to a site.  This would 
>go something like this:
>
>  
>
We already do this. Many people already include multiple <link> tags 
specifying different versions of their feeds. Between that and standard 
auto-discovery techniques, we're generally able to find all the RSS 
files for a given blog.

I guess the proposal under discussion is just a different way of 
presenting that data, or for dealing with it at one level up, on a 
per-site basis, instead of a per-blog basis.


Mark
--
Mark Fletcher
Bloglines
http://www.bloglines.com


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.