Re: Re: My take on shared feed lists
Mark Fletcher <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.syndication.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sam Ruby wrote: ><link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="RSS" >href="http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/index.rdf"> > >On that page is lots of orange XML buttons. Three of which actually are >related to Jeremy's site. All three are valid RSS. One of which >contains full posts, the others merely contain summaries. > >It would be nice if a person who knows nothing about directory or feed >formats could be presented with the option to chose between full format >and summary when they say they want to subscribe to a site. This would >go something like this: > > > We already do this. Many people already include multiple <link> tags specifying different versions of their feeds. Between that and standard auto-discovery techniques, we're generally able to find all the RSS files for a given blog. I guess the proposal under discussion is just a different way of presenting that data, or for dealing with it at one level up, on a per-site basis, instead of a per-blog basis. Mark -- Mark Fletcher Bloglines http://www.bloglines.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/