Re: Feed List Format
"Bill Kearney" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.syndication.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> And supporting a new format would definitely require more work than > hooking into an already supported format. If I have a function call that > already parses OPML, I don't need to do anything else. The biggest problem is it's inability to use anything other than attributes. There are some things that just won't work in that manner. Were it to have been structured to support a more container-like entity there'd be some hope. But it's not and as an outliner format it doesn't need to change. Although, God forbid, one could graft some RDF attributes inside the soup and potentially leverage out of it's inane straightjacket. I'm sure both camps would have seizures seeing THAT sort of hack. > The more work that is required to implement the functionality (both on > the consumer and producer sides), the fewer sites and clients will > support it. Quite right and as a prime source of RSS feed data I'm interested in being able to have Syndic8 publish as much /useful/ data as is possible. I'm stating the OPML is insufficient for this and that I'd like to open the door to others in developing an alternative. We've been ruminating on this for quite some time. Now that there's a diversity of reader programs there's potential for growth. The impact on existing readers is quite likely to be negligble. If anything, let's keep an eye toward structuring the data such that it lends itself to something like a *very* easy XSLT template. Should something be unable to handle it in native form then we can just run a proxy that transcodes it back into the dumbed-down opml form. -Bill Kearney Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/