Re: Re: [FeedValidator] (Fwd) Inconsistency in dcterms date element validation with te

Hi

On Sun 17-Oct-2004 at 08:45:52AM -0400, Bill Kearney wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I see the sense in this view. Re-reading the proposed module, it
> > says "... if you wish to use a rich content model please refer to the
> > Expressing Qualified Dublin Core in RDF / XML ...". Whereas the
> > standard DC module says "The rich version will be maintained so as to
> > be compliant with current discussion."
> >
> > http://web.resource.org/rss/1.0/modules/dc/
> > http://web.resource.org/rss/1.0/modules/dcterms/
> >
> > Perhaps this question should be turned over to RSS-DEV? Copying Chris
> > for the time being.
> 
> Well, what say ye fellow rss-dev members?  Any comments?

Um, what is the question exactly?

Chris

PS I _know_ that I need to update the dcterms module to fix some
bugs and also add the new elements....

-- 
Chris Croome                               <chris-u/[email protected]>
web design                             http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/ 
web content management                               http://mkdoc.com/   


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/