Re: Re: mod_enclosures proposal
"Bill Kearney" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.syndication.rss.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.ideaspace.net/users/wkearney/foaf.xrdf |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > developer should especially not be left with the illusion that an
> > XML-Parser is the right to to access RDF Site Summaries.
So be sure you write them equivalent tools.
> I share your general sentiments but unfortunately most of the widely
> used tools do follow that approach, and it looks to me like aggregator
> developers have tended to copy the design of existing tools rather
> than looking to the specs.
>
> I'm not sure, but until there's a good proportion of RDF-capable
> aggregators out in the wild, I've a feeling it would be
> counter-productive to press any harder for full RDF/XML
> interpretation. I'm pretty sure that increased syntax complexity
> without an infrastructure that can use it won't help adoption - the
> 'simple' XML crowd run a mile.
Right or wrong the uptake of creating and using RSS has succeeded from being
'reasonably' simple for the various parties involved.
> On the other hand, if for every new vocab used alongside RSS there's
> an app demonstrating the coolness, we might just make progress.
This is probably the most important point. Well said.
This is why I'm interested in see that an attempt to "add" other data to a
feed not be a one-trick-pony; only good for just enclosures. I'd rather
have a mechanism that invites tool developers to add more than just
something like enclosure detection/consumption. As in, detect the presense
of a seeAlso sort of element and then recognize they're enclosures. It's
that two-step process that might allow for detection and use of more than
just an enclosure type. It's also, potentially, an easier way for the tools
to present a UI option. That an item "has more" is one step, that options
exist on what to do with any number of different 'types' of them is
something else. Sort of like mail having generic 'attachments', you want to
know they're present but what you do with them, or have your tools handle,
is dependent on another layer of choices.
-Bill Kearney
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/