Re: Rich syntax for DC modules and validation

On 29 Nov 2004, at 21:05, Danny Ayers wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:17:53 -0000, Phil Shaw <phil-BtY/pAun/[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
> > Dust has settled on this for a while, so I thought I would try to
> > give it a final push with an assertion that the rich syntax for DC
> > module metadata is valid RSS 1.0.

> I might perhaps have given the wrong impression with recent posts re.
> <enclosure>, but my own opinion is that RSS 1.0 augmented with *any*
> other elements and attributes should be considered valid RSS as long
> as the core requirements are in place and the file as a whole is valid
> RDF/XML. I can't speak for the RSS 1.0 WG, but I do get the impression
> from the published specs that this should be the case.

Thanks Danny, since there has been nothing further, I'll take this 
back to the validator group.

Best regards,

Phil
--
<URL:http://www.codestyle.org/>


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/