Re: RSS 1.1

Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.syndication.rss.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Sean B. Palmer wrote:

> Thanks for the ongoing comments everyone. We're simmering all the
> feedback into a new draft, which we think will answer most concerns.
> Expect it Monday, hopefully. A few comments to Reto's though:
>
> Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote:
>
>> - the image property has an xml:lang attribute, but this is not legal
>> in RDF as only plain-literals may have an xml:lang
>
>
> Wrong: elements inherit xml:lang from their parents, so it's valid at
> any point in the tree. Try it in the RDF Validator [1].

right, but -as opposed to a dc:language property - it has no effect on
the Image resource but only on the plain-literals within it, given that
link is a plain-literal (but it should be XSD anyURI) the language
information applies also to this one, which seems a bit strange to me.

>> - Why can a channel have only one title?
>
>
> It's a primary title, so that user agents don't have to choose between
> them. You can use dc:title for alternatives. As Chris said elsewhere:
>
>    There's also the fact that most feeds simply don't have a need for
>    metadata to be used in this way: they have seperate RSS feeds for
>    different language. Tools don't expect the RDF way of doing things -
>    they want one title, not 4.

I don't think having separate RSS feeds with different URLs is a good
idea when using a protocol which supports language negotiation [1]. For
a page that supports multiple languages bot statement:

<http://wymiwyg.org/> <rss:title> "Willkommen bei wymiwyg"@de
<http://wymiwyg.org/> <rss:title> "Benvenuti da wymiwyg"@it

seem to be equally correct. In both stmts "rss:title" refers to the
primary title and so using a different property (like dc:title) does not
seem to justified. While for RDF-Applications I see no reason for
limiting the title to one - this may be reasonable for XML-Clients (I
don't know, I don't do XML), if this is the case it should be
constrained in the XML Schema - not in the ontology. This would allow
both of the above statements to be in the rdf-repository on the server,
but when a RSS document is delivered the title that best matches the
client's request is delivered.


reto


1. http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-when-lang-neg



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.