Re: RSS 1.1
Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.syndication.rss.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sean B. Palmer wrote:
> Thanks for the ongoing comments everyone. We're simmering all the
> feedback into a new draft, which we think will answer most concerns.
> Expect it Monday, hopefully. A few comments to Reto's though:
>
> Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote:
>
>> - the image property has an xml:lang attribute, but this is not legal
>> in RDF as only plain-literals may have an xml:lang
>
>
> Wrong: elements inherit xml:lang from their parents, so it's valid at
> any point in the tree. Try it in the RDF Validator [1].
right, but -as opposed to a dc:language property - it has no effect on
the Image resource but only on the plain-literals within it, given that
link is a plain-literal (but it should be XSD anyURI) the language
information applies also to this one, which seems a bit strange to me.
>> - Why can a channel have only one title?
>
>
> It's a primary title, so that user agents don't have to choose between
> them. You can use dc:title for alternatives. As Chris said elsewhere:
>
> There's also the fact that most feeds simply don't have a need for
> metadata to be used in this way: they have seperate RSS feeds for
> different language. Tools don't expect the RDF way of doing things -
> they want one title, not 4.
I don't think having separate RSS feeds with different URLs is a good
idea when using a protocol which supports language negotiation [1]. For
a page that supports multiple languages bot statement:
<http://wymiwyg.org/> <rss:title> "Willkommen bei wymiwyg"@de
<http://wymiwyg.org/> <rss:title> "Benvenuti da wymiwyg"@it
seem to be equally correct. In both stmts "rss:title" refers to the
primary title and so using a different property (like dc:title) does not
seem to justified. While for RDF-Applications I see no reason for
limiting the title to one - this may be reasonable for XML-Clients (I
don't know, I don't do XML), if this is the case it should be
constrained in the XML Schema - not in the ontology. This would allow
both of the above statements to be in the rdf-repository on the server,
but when a RSS document is delivered the title that best matches the
client's request is delivered.
reto
1. http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-when-lang-neg
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/