Re: Re: enclosure status?

On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 02:09:19AM +0200, Suzan Foster wrote:
> 
> 
> On Apr 9, 2005, at 2:00 AM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Dan Brickley wrote:
> >> but one quick point (all else looks good...): perhaps enc:url= could
> >> be replaced with use of the rdf:resource= notation, which will
> >> tell generic RDF tools that a URI is being used.
> > ...
> >> Using enc:url is OK, but will make certain RDF queries harder
> >> to express, since the RDF layer wouldn't realise that the thing that
> >> is the value of the enc:enclosure property is the thing with the
> >> cc:permits and foaf:maker property, so more application-level smarts
> >> would be required.
> >
> > Taking advantage of RSS 1.0's RDF-nature is a Good Thing, so I am for
> > this.
> 
> If there are no objections i'll make the changes.

I am also in favor.

-- 
Christopher Schmidt


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/