Re: Absolute URLs are required in RSS 2 descriptions or not?

"A. Pagaltzis" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.syndication.rss.support
Message-ID <20070629124526.GD20058__41511.817315086$1183122362$gmane$org@klangraum>
* d <[email protected]> [2007-06-29 01:25]:
> The online feed validators are claiming that relative urls are
> not allowed in html inside of the description element in RSS 2.
> And I've read many people saying that online.
> 
> Is that a myth?  Where in the spec does it say that?
> 
> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html
> 
> It talks about it for <link> and <url> elements being absolute
> but not <description>.

It doesn’t say links have to be absolute, but it doesn’t explain
how to resolve relative URIs either. Therefore aggregators have
no canonical basis on which to decide, and so they do different
things. Hence if you use relative URIs, regardless of what they
are relative to, they will fail to resolve for some portion of
your readership.

Conclusion: don’t use relative URIs.

Corollary: the validator is right to call this out.

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-public/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.