Re: Duplicate Mime-version error with 1.7.5

On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 03:06:04PM +0200, Matt Anton wrote:
> > has the disadvantage that we might break nested mime-structures. no
> > replacing them might lead to bogus mime articles (hand supplied
> > header says CTE=quoted-printable, but body is in 8bit, etc.pp.)
> 
> Ok, i should drink more tea as i had some mime-headers in my
> ~/.tin/headers
> 
> I've added them while tin didn't put ifself mime-version,
> content-transfer-encoding and content-type headers in an old version (you

tin doesn't add them if post_8bit_header is ON (as it doesn't make any
sense to ignore RFC2047 (use plain 8bit chars) but follow RFC2045).
(but for e.g. fr.* that is what is "required", use plain/undeclared
8bit chars in the header but use mime-headers for the body...)

urs