Re: New beta release coming -- 2.50 or 2.51

Thanks — I think that settles it.  I’ll switch back to 2.51.

Sorry for the confusion.

   - B

> On Jan 23, 2018, at 2:23 PM, Andrew Schulman <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>> Dear unison hackers,
>> 
>> We’re getting ready to publish a new beta release of Unison, and we have a question about what major version number to give it.
>> 
>> The version number got bumped to 2.51 for a while in the master branch of the git repo, but later I realized that there was no need for this, since the set of preferences hasn’t changed.  Yesterday, I changed it back to 2.50, but this apparently confused at least one person who had already installed 2.51.  
>> 
>> If a lot of people have already installed 2.51 then we should just put it back to 2.51.  This is what I will do (later today) by default, since I have no way of knowing how many people this is.
> 
> Cygwin has already released a unison2.51 package. We could remove it, but
> it'd be easier to have a new release of unison 2.51.x.
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrew
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unison-hackers mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://LISTS.SEAS.UPENN.EDU/mailman/listinfo/unison-hackers <https://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/unison-hackers>

_______________________________________________
Unison-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
https://LISTS.SEAS.UPENN.EDU/mailman/listinfo/unison-hackers