Re: New beta release coming -- 2.50 or 2.51
Steve Kalkwarf <[email protected]> Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:31:42 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.unison.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Version numbers are free, so I always make sure they increase. If 2.51 doesn't feel like a nice, round major version, call it 2.60. > On Jan 23, 2018, at 10:57 AM, Benjamin C. Pierce <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear unison hackers, > > We’re getting ready to publish a new beta release of Unison, and we have a question about what major version number to give it. > > The version number got bumped to 2.51 for a while in the master branch of the git repo, but later I realized that there was no need for this, since the set of preferences hasn’t changed. Yesterday, I changed it back to 2.50, but this apparently confused at least one person who had already installed 2.51. > > If a lot of people have already installed 2.51 then we should just put it back to 2.51. This is what I will do (later today) by default, since I have no way of knowing how many people this is. > > Thoughts? > > - B > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Unison-hackers mailing list > [email protected] > https://LISTS.SEAS.UPENN.EDU/mailman/listinfo/unison-hackers _______________________________________________ Unison-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://LISTS.SEAS.UPENN.EDU/mailman/listinfo/unison-hackers
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 3.8 KB) - not displayed