Re: New beta release coming -- 2.50 or 2.51

But changing version numbers is not completely free, since they have to match between client and server...

   - B

> On Jan 23, 2018, at 2:31 PM, Steve Kalkwarf <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> Version numbers are free, so I always make sure they increase.
> 
> If 2.51 doesn't feel like a nice, round major version, call it 2.60.
> 
>> On Jan 23, 2018, at 10:57 AM, Benjamin C. Pierce <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear unison hackers,
>> 
>> We’re getting ready to publish a new beta release of Unison, and we have a question about what major version number to give it.
>> 
>> The version number got bumped to 2.51 for a while in the master branch of the git repo, but later I realized that there was no need for this, since the set of preferences hasn’t changed.  Yesterday, I changed it back to 2.50, but this apparently confused at least one person who had already installed 2.51.  
>> 
>> If a lot of people have already installed 2.51 then we should just put it back to 2.51.  This is what I will do (later today) by default, since I have no way of knowing how many people this is.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> - B
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Unison-hackers mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://LISTS.SEAS.UPENN.EDU/mailman/listinfo/unison-hackers
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unison-hackers mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://LISTS.SEAS.UPENN.EDU/mailman/listinfo/unison-hackers

_______________________________________________
Unison-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
https://LISTS.SEAS.UPENN.EDU/mailman/listinfo/unison-hackers