Re: prefer mv in unison?
Kyle Evans <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.unison.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree, moves would be far superior when dealing with large files, pictures, videos, etc. If I mv a file locally, it has the same inode number. This should make a move easily identifiable, even if it was renamed in the process. It will have the same modification time and the same checksum. On Sunday, August 9, 2020 at 5:15:26 PM UTC-4 [email protected] wrote: > Hi, > > I see the following screen output from unison. It is a little strange > to me. Why not just mv the file? Why copying is needed in this case? > In my use case, mv is faster than cp, it would better if there is a > way to use mv as much as possible. Is there a way to use prefer mv in > unison? > > Shortcut: copied /xxx/a/b/c/d/e/f.pdf from local file > /xxx/.unison.a.d2bd4183da0656664a0b50b8452cf817.unison.tmp/b/c/d/e/f.pdf > > -- > Regards, > Peng > -- To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].