RE: RE: RC197 Online
"Steve Bostedor" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.vnc.ultravnc.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
For feature requests and bug reports RC15 RC16. Please use the forum at http://forum.ultravnc.net/ I do have to point out how interesting it is that everyone seems to be moving away from the GPL and privatizing the source code ownership. :) I'm not saying that's a bad thing, just an observation. I figured that it was just a matter of time until the RealVNC folks put a cap on the GPL license. I am having a hard time grasping how the regular version of VNC4 can be under the GPL but the Enterprise version is not. Aren't they the same code base but with an added feature set in the Enterprise version? The UltraVNC situation is completely understandable, though, in my opinion. The source code is in a transitional state and it's completely reasonable to ask people to wait until everything is back in order before issuing the code again. Also, Bob brought up the VNC ActiveX control that is being sold on the Internet without source and with no intent to offer it. Who is to enforce the GPL on him, UltraVNC, or anyone else for that matter? Is there an authority that forces compliance? If not, then why even bother debating it? - Steve Bostedor http://www.vncscan.com -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of James Weatherall Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 1:53 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Ultravnc-list] RE: RC197 Online For feature requests and bug reports RC15 RC16. Please use the forum at http://forum.ultravnc.net/ Adam, VNC Enterprise Edition isn't based on the old VNC 3.3 system, but on VNC 4.0, which is wholly owned by RealVNC Ltd. Cheers, Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam > Erica > Sent: 07 March 2005 17:07 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Ultravnc-list] RE: RC197 Online > > Wez, > > Just out of curiosity do you release the source code to your > enterprise edition? If not, what steps do you take to not release it > under the GPL Licence? > > Adam > > >Rudi, > > > >If you have written permission from both authors to use the > code under a > >non-GPL licence then obviously that make a big difference! > Is there any > >reason you didn"t mention this earlier? > > > >Cheers, > > > >Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. > > > > > ________________________________ > > Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! > Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web > <http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/> > ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click