Re: Cringley's bridge

"Alon K" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.wireless.bay-area
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

Can someone help me to unsubscribe?

Thanks,

A

>From: Sean Lazar <[email protected]>

>To: DaveC <[email protected]>

>CC: [email protected]

>Subject: Re: [BAWUG] Cringley's bridge

>Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 17:39:23 -0700

>

>You've stumped me now... is this the article you're referring to?

>http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20010628.html This article

>was written in 2001, before Apple Airport Extreme was sold. So this

>leaves out using WDS with Apple Airport Extreme. He must have used

>KarlNet firmware. He mentions Doug Karl in the article. You need to

>get KarlNet software from www.karlnet.com. This will enable these

>devices to act as a point to point bridge, I am almost sure of it.

>You will also need to get the mentioned "Apple G-4 internal antenna

>cables that matched the custom Airport coax connector" which is

>really a pigtail with the special Apple connector (help me guys,

>what's the name???). Of course you will have to take apart your base

>stations. Put them in outdoor NEMA grey boxes and hack up some POE

>while you're at it. Do I win a scooby snack?

>

>Cheers,

>Sean Lazar

>

>Below is an excerpt from the KarlNet knowlegdebase:

>

>What hardware can be loaded with KarlNet software?

>Category General

>Sub-Category General-Hardware

>Instructions Company Model Number

>Alvarion Breezenet AP DS.11b - (Must be in force reload mode to

>function.

>Apple Airport (not Airport Extreme)

>Avaya AP-1

>Avaya AP-2

>Bromax WS-300

>Buffalo WLI-T1-S11G (make sure it is the unit without an external

>antenna)

>Hawking WA-300

>KarlNet POGO

>KarlNet KN-50

>KarlNet KN-100/200

>Linksys WET-11 (Not Cisco Herme I version)

>Lucent AP-500

>Lucent AP-1000

>Lucent RG-1000

>Lucent RG-1100

>Soekris 4511

>Teletronics EZBridge

>Teletronics I-EZBridge

>

>Many Vendors such as Dell, Sony and Compaq private brand some of the

>Avaya/Lucent products. Please check with Vendor/Manufacture for

>compliance with original product!

>

>DaveC wrote:

>

>>I'm trying to get a remote AP's signal into my laptop. I've

>>addressed different possibilities in various threads in this list.

>>

>>I am confused about something (well, actually about many things,

>>but...). Bob Cringley made wireless fame by describing in his

>>column how he accomplished what I am attempting by using two

>>AirPort base stations and a couple of home-built hi-gain antennas.

>>

>>Regardless what you think about the extent of BC's claims, I am

>>confused about the basic premise. I thought two base stations won't

>>talk to each other. I thought that if you want to make a link

>>(bridge) between two points, you have two choices:

>>

>> - use a hi-gain antenna on a base station and a hi-gain antenna

>>cabled directly to the remote computer's wireless card

>>

>> - use two wireless bridge/routers with hi-gain antennas

>>

>>Could someone help me at least get the premise straight? Can two

>>base stations be used to connect remote segments of a network? I

>>presume that Cringley had some level of success with this

>>configuration.

>>

>>I know that buying and implementing bridges will do the job, but I

>>want to know if using two *base stations* (which I actually own)

>>will work.

>>

>>What about BC's bridge?

>>

>>Thanks,

>>Dave

>>_______________________________________________

>>BAWUG's general wireless chat mailing list

>>[unsubscribe] http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

>>

>>

>_______________________________________________

>BAWUG's general wireless chat mailing list

>[unsubscribe] http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

----------
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*

_______________________________________________
BAWUG's general wireless chat mailing list
[unsubscribe] http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.