Re: Re: SBC routinely installing 2Wire 400 mW AP/FW
Jim Thompson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.bay-area |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Apr 22, 2004, at 7:20 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: > If its FCCID: PGR2WHPLHW, (which is, btw, an older certification), > then they claim (and tested) 26.02dBm of tx power into a 2dBi antenna, > for 633.9mW EIRP. This is the 400mW unit. I forgot to add that this unit shows a real lack of understanding of RF. Its senseless to have this much downlink power when the client's will have (much) less. Even a 100mW Cisco card will be 6dB down, with Agere and other cards perhaps 10dB down. So the AP sends a packet at 11Mbps, it gets through, and the client ACKs (likely at 2Mbps, but lets not get into that just now.) The the client (STA) wants to send a packet, It 'knows' that the AP got through at 11Mbps, so it attempts at 11Mbps, doesn't get an ACK, retries N times, then starts to fall-back. In the worst-case scenerio, it succeeds at 1Mbps, and receives an ACK for its trouble. Then, sometime a short while later, the AP downlinks again (successfully) at 11Mpbs, and the whole thing starts over, since, for all the STA knows, the situation that caused the massive fall-back has become (much) better. (Fortunately, most of the traffic in a home is *from* the Internet, not *to* it.) Jim _______________________________________________ BAWUG's general wireless chat mailing list [unsubscribe] http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless