Re: Re: SBC routinely installing 2Wire 400 mW AP/FW

Jim Thompson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.wireless.bay-area
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Apr 22, 2004, at 7:20 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
> If its FCCID: PGR2WHPLHW, (which is, btw, an older certification), 
> then they claim (and tested) 26.02dBm of tx power into a 2dBi antenna, 
> for 633.9mW EIRP.  This is the 400mW unit.

I forgot to add that this unit shows a real lack of understanding of 
RF.  Its senseless to have this much downlink power when the client's 
will have (much) less.   Even a 100mW Cisco card will be 6dB down, with 
Agere and other cards perhaps 10dB down.

So the AP sends a packet at 11Mbps, it gets through, and the client 
ACKs (likely at 2Mbps, but lets not get into that just now.)

The the client (STA) wants to send a packet,  It 'knows' that the AP 
got through at 11Mbps, so it attempts at 11Mbps, doesn't get an ACK, 
retries N times, then starts to fall-back.  In the worst-case scenerio, 
it succeeds at 1Mbps, and receives an ACK for its trouble.

Then, sometime a short while later, the AP downlinks again 
(successfully) at 11Mpbs, and the whole thing starts over, since, for 
all the STA knows, the situation that caused the massive fall-back has 
become (much) better.

(Fortunately, most of the traffic in a home is *from* the Internet, not 
*to* it.)

Jim

_______________________________________________
BAWUG's general wireless chat mailing list
[unsubscribe] http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.