Re: [CUWiN] accept FreeNetworks peering agreement?
David Young <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.cu-wireless |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 07:03:46PM -0500, Bryan Cribbs wrote: > I have no objections. Do you know what is needed to > satisfy section II.1 ? (At a brief glance, I could not > find examples of what other freenetworks have published > on their sites). Our "network design" document should suffice. I will ask. In light of the fact that freenetworks.org members are tunneling to each other, we should re-work our IPv4 numbering scheme to use our 10/8 address reservation at freenetworks.org, 10.24/16. While we are at it, we should make the routes aggregable. This is really going to pinch the hack we use to make IPs out of MACs. :-) Just to stay focused on our current development, we should postpone this change until next year. Dave -- David Young OJC Technologies [email protected] Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933 _______________________________________________ CU-Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/cu-wireless Project Page: http://cuwireless.ucimc.org