Re: [CUWiN] HSLS Behavior Question
Sanjai Narain <[email protected]> Mon, 28 May 2007 22:21:20 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.cu-wireless |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi David: In view of your note, it looks like the behavior from HSLS we
see below is incorrect. Can you please let us know what additional tests
we could perform to confirm or deny this hypothesis. Can you point us to
the specific section/files of the code that we could look at? Thanks. --
Sanjai
In our testbed that emulates mobility and losses:
* There are four nodes, 6, 7, 10, 66.
* Between times 292 and 598, 6 continues to advertise 10, 66, 7 as
its neighbors in Hello messages
* Yet 10 does not advertise 6 in its Hello messages.
Since 6 is advertising 10 as its neighbor, it has heard 10's hello. So,
10 should advertise 6 as its neighbor. But it does not for about 5 minutes.
Time Sender ----Neighbors----
292 6 10 66 7
293 10 66 7
294 6 10 66 7
295 10 66 7
296 6 10 66 7
297 10 66 7
298 6 10 66 7
299 10 66 7
300 6 10 66 7
301 10 66 7
302 6 10 66 7
303 10 66 7
304 6 10 66 7
305 10 66 7
306 6 10 66 7
307 10 66 7
308 6 10 66 7
309 10 66 7
310 6 10 66 7
311 10 66 7
312 6 10 66 7
313 10 66 7
314 6 10 66 7
315 10 66 7
316 6 10 66 7
317 10 66 7
318 6 10 66 7
319 10 66 7
... Pattern continues till time 598.
--
Sanjai Narain, Ph.D.
Senior Research Scientist
Information Assurance and Security Department
Telcordia Technologies, Inc.
1 Telcordia Drive, Room 1N-375
Piscataway, NJ 08854
732 699 2806 (T)
908 337 3636 (M)
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
CU-Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/cu-wireless
Project Page: http://cuwireless.ucimc.org