Re: Wifi Booster for less than a buck.
"Paul Charles Leddy" <[email protected]> Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:54:29 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.portland.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
and know about this? http://www.bwmo.net/download.html page 196, baby (said, austin powers-like). looks like a bit of a steep learning curve On Nov 22, 2007 9:08 AM, Tyler Booth <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, there is likely a fraction of a db of loss in the solder joint, > and more importantly if you don't get your measurements exactly right, > it's not going to be tuned to the correct frequency (2.4ghz). With all > that in mind, all this is doing is creating an omni that has a > "flatter" horizontal plane, thus focusing power further out > (increasing horizontal range) while directing power away from the > vertical plane (decreasing your vertical range). > > Basically the same idea as replacing your linksys rubber ducky antenna > with a 9dbi omni. It's misleading that they call this a "booster"... > > > On Nov 20, 2007, at 3:34 PM, Russell Senior wrote: > > >>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Higgins <[email protected]> writes: > > > > Tom> Someone give this a try, id love to see what the hard numbers > > Tom> are. If I get a break in the holidays I might try it on an old > > Tom> linksys duck. > > > > I've cobbled together something similar while testing 11a radios and > > needing something to radiate *something*. What the video is showing > > is equivalent to about a 5 dBi antenna, which is where the "twice the > > range and twice the power" is coming from. 5 dBi is "twice the power" > > compared to 2 dBi, as your power doubles for every 3 dB. However, > > your power drops as the square of the distance (2 squared is 4x) or > > about 6 dBi for every doubling of distance, so that part is wrong. > > Bearing in mind my non-expertness in RF, I'd be suspicious of losses > > in that solder joint too, if it isn't done cleanly. > > > > The nice book > > > > http://wndw.net/download.html > > > > has some material on antenna construction and theory. It even points > > at some software NEC2. See: > > > > http://wndw.net/pdf/chapter4.pdf > > > > > > -- > > Russell Senior, Secretary > > [email protected] > > > > -- > > The Personal Telco Project - http://www.personaltelco.net/ > > Donate to PTP: http://www.personaltelco.net/donate > > Un/Subscribe: http://lists.personaltelco.net/mailman/listinfo/ > > general/ > > Archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireless.portland.general/ > > Etiquette: http://www.personaltelco.net/index.cgi/MailingListEtiquette > > > > -- > The Personal Telco Project - http://www.personaltelco.net/ > Donate to PTP: http://www.personaltelco.net/donate > Un/Subscribe: http://lists.personaltelco.net/mailman/listinfo/general/ > Archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireless.portland.general/ > Etiquette: http://www.personaltelco.net/index.cgi/MailingListEtiquette > -- The Personal Telco Project - http://www.personaltelco.net/ Donate to PTP: http://www.personaltelco.net/donate Un/Subscribe: http://lists.personaltelco.net/mailman/listinfo/general/ Archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireless.portland.general/ Etiquette: http://www.personaltelco.net/index.cgi/MailingListEtiquette