Re: Wifi Booster for less than a buck.
Russell Senior <[email protected]> 23 Nov 2007 12:58:47 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.portland.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Tyler" == Tyler Booth <[email protected]> writes: Tyler> True, but I tend to think of a "booster" as some sort of Tyler> artificial amplification. Something you would place between Tyler> your radio and antenna. I think calling a stronger antenna a Tyler> "booster" is just mis- leading. FWIW, as a HAM radio Tyler> enthusiast, I tend to think DIY antennas are much cooler than Tyler> the commercial antennas. But from experience, the ones you pay Tyler> for always work better. That's because HAMs work in a frequency regime where test equipment is much more affordable and can therefore tell what the heck they are doing, electrically. Unless a wifi hacker has a $3k+ spectrum analyzer or whatnot, they are mostly just fumbling in the dark. -- Russell Senior, Secretary [email protected] -- The Personal Telco Project - http://www.personaltelco.net/ Donate to PTP: http://www.personaltelco.net/donate Un/Subscribe: http://lists.personaltelco.net/mailman/listinfo/general/ Archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireless.portland.general/ Etiquette: http://www.personaltelco.net/index.cgi/MailingListEtiquette