Re: Pre-n or not Pre-n
Faisal Rahman <[email protected]> Wed, 7 Sep 2005 05:04:42 +0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.seattle.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Antenna spacing is greater than 1/2 wavelength. MIMO benifits from scatter. On 9/7/05, Casey Halverson <[email protected]> wrote: > FYI, > > Removing, adding, or modifying antennas with pre-n/n hardware is a bad > idea. > > Beam forming is only possible by properly spaced antennas. Putting two > random antennas at different phases with different lengths of coax is > asking for trouble. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > [email protected] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 7:09 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Pre-n or not Pre-n > > > > I need to wifi a 110 acre hilly farm to provide access to two > > other sites several hundred yards apart which cannot see each > > other. (A can see B and C, but B and C cannot see each other) > > Some foilage is obstructing the view from A to B and C, but > > using a patch antenna and gain omni a low speed connection > > was made during a test. They currently have one WRT54G and a > > 10db FAB omni. > > > > Do you get any benefit from pre-n equipment when only the AP > > is pre- n and the clients are 801.11g/b? Assuming you do, > > which of the following systems would work better (or make one > > up yourself)? > > > > 1. Put a WRT54GX pre-n AP at point A (are the antennas removable? > > It doesn't seem so), put a WRT54G with highest gain patch > > antenna I can find at points B and C. > > > > 2. Put a WRT54G(S) at all three locations. Put high gain > > omni at point A and high gain patches at points B and C. > > > > Cost is a factor. The network needs to be reliable and able > > to run voip and hopefully a webcam. I would like to mesh or > > run WDS to provide general coverage over the area as much as > > possible, but that is more of a side effect. Providing > > access to the two remote locations is the primary purpose. I > > picked the linksys boxes was because they are hackable, > > inexpensive and I already have a few. > > > > Suggestions? > > > > > > > > Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get secure > > FREE email: http://www.hushmail.com/?l=2 > > > > Free, ultra-private instant messaging with Hush Messenger > > http://www.hushmail.com/services-messenger?l=434 > > > > Promote security and make money with the Hushmail Affiliate Program: > > http://www.hushmail.com/about-affiliate?l=427 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/dev > _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/dev