RE: Pre-n or not Pre-n
"Dan" <[email protected]> Wed, 7 Sep 2005 13:33:55 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.seattle.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Well, that depends on what pre-n/n manufacturer's gear you are using. Not all of the current pre-n MIMO chipsets use beam-forming. Check out: http://mrtmag.com/mag/radio_vendors_not_waiting/ "The Wi-Fi MIMO market has separated into different technology camps. For instance, Belkin and Linksys offer MIMO products based on Airgo's chips and its spatial multiplexing technology, and Netgear is incorporating both Airgo's chips and additional smart antenna technology, known as sectorized antennas, from Video54. However, D-Link is using chips from competitor Atheros Communications, which is incorporating beam-forming smart antenna technology." I'm thinking it would be OK to modify or replace the antennas on the Airgo-based boxes at least. Cheers, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:dev- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Casey Halverson > Sent: Wednesday, 7 September 2005 7:41 > To: SeattleWireless Development List > Subject: RE: Pre-n or not Pre-n > > FYI, > > Removing, adding, or modifying antennas with pre-n/n hardware is a bad > idea. > > Beam forming is only possible by properly spaced antennas. Putting two > random antennas at different phases with different lengths of coax is > asking for trouble. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/dev