Re: WRT54G as a router

"Franklin S Werren" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.wireless.seattle.general
Message-ID <00d301c4fe94$f20debb0$6464a8c0@laptop>
Personally I would....
I usually add the Sveasoft update and turn off the WAP ....
It is also an easy way to admin the thing
from your laptop, I set it up, turn off beacon, use WEP and Mac Address
actually use real low power setting like 1 mw unless you are concerned
that some real slick local will hack it and it is on a business system.

Franklin S. Werren  www.bagpipes.net   www.chautauqualake.net

My 2 cents: Never get caught between an ISP and a telco in a pissing match!!
                   The customer looses every time!!!



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Moseley" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 5:17 PM
Subject: WRT54G as a router


> This is a rather basic question:
>
> I need to do a "parent" network installation.  They currently don't need
> the wireless, but I was thinking about buying the WRT54G instead of a
> dedicated router only (like a BEFSR41 or BEFSR81 - which are very close
> in price to the WRT54G) and disable the wireless for now.
>
> Is there any reason not to go that route? Seems like 802.11g for $10
> extra is a good deal. All I need is NAT and a decent firewall to put
> in front of their Windows machines.
>
> BTW - Is it worth buying the WRT54GS over the WRT54G?
>
>
>
> -- 
> Bill Moseley
> [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
>
> 


_______________________________________________
Talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.