Re: WRT54G as a router
"Ken Dickinson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.seattle.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Personally I would go the WRT54GS. I use two of these with the SVEASOFT firmware with mine and the do a great job. Also since they use iptables you can setup a good firewall. Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: Bill Moseley<mailto:[email protected]> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 2:17 PM Subject: WRT54G as a router This is a rather basic question: I need to do a "parent" network installation. They currently don't need the wireless, but I was thinking about buying the WRT54G instead of a dedicated router only (like a BEFSR41 or BEFSR81 - which are very close in price to the WRT54G) and disable the wireless for now. Is there any reason not to go that route? Seems like 802.11g for $10 extra is a good deal. All I need is NAT and a decent firewall to put in front of their Windows machines. BTW - Is it worth buying the WRT54GS over the WRT54G? -- Bill Moseley [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Talk mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk<http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk> _______________________________________________ Talk mailing list [email protected] http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk