Re: wifi-plus antennas, was VT problem
"Bryan (mobile)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.seattle.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Comparision results, MP antenna verses Circular Poloraized http://www.wifi-plus.com/pages/13/index.htm David Josephson wrote: > It's too bad that the antenna people in this business so often make > their case with so much smoke and noise that the average user can't > tell what's real and what's fluff. Wifi-plus is nothing more or less > than stacked, radome-enclosed, more or less circularly polarized, > array antennas such as have been used for FM broadcast for 40 years or > more. There is some benefit to this, particularly in urban areas, but > no antenna is magic, and no antenna is going to make pine needles and > leaves disappear. Any antenna produces "gain" solely by directing more > of the power you feed it in one direction and less in others; a > circularly polarized antenna can actually result in lower signal > strength because part of the signal is radiated in a polarization that > isn't received by a given, optimal, receiving antenna. Over a > point-to-point link you're not going to do any better than well > matched parabolic antennas aligned to the same polarization. > > >> Bryan (mobile) wrote: >> >>> >>> For some really impresive stories go to their forum @ >>> http://www.wifi-plus.shoppingcartsplus.com/page/page/567784.htm >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ Talk mailing list [email protected] http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk