Re: Off topic - personal problem in VT
"Robert Currey" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.seattle.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <009d01c504a4$778b1b40$1e140a0a@romulus> |
I've been watching this thread for a while since I have a similar circumstance (2 buildings with LOS pseudo blocked by trees, and >500 feet apart). Right now, I got the best LOS I could and use a pair of "cantennas" to get a decent wireless link. It is at the "tolerable" level of performance. I'm now looking to go ahead and bury fiber and use it (probably with a pair of linksys EF-3124 + fiber expansion cards). total equipment cost should be around $500, and will provide a killer link (now and for the future). Rob ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Josephson" <[email protected]> To: "SeattleWireless Talk List" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 12:47 PM Subject: Re: Off topic - personal problem in VT > > > Jim Mayor wrote: > > > Our initial concept was just to provide them with a wireless PCI card > > and that would be it. We have since discovered that trees hinder the > > signal while wood floors apparently do not. We have talked to several > > vendors who claim great distances for their wireless communications, > > but /none/ will encourage us when we mention trees, even with “high” > > gain external antennas. > > The other comments you have received pretty much cover it. You may get > lots of gain from antennas, but going through pine needles can result in > a loss of 10 dB per *foot* or more. > > > We next considered simple hard-wiring until we were told that 300' is > > the practical limitation for hardwiring without repeaters. We have not > > totally discounted fiber-optics, but no one seems to be able to help > > us and we suspect the cost will be high. We have seem the many clever > > antennas that are floating around the internet, but when mentioned, > > the words “line of sight” always pop up. One guy put it, “Leaves > > really attenuate the signal.” Actually we don’t have so many “leaves” > > as needles, but I trust the attenuation difference is negligible. > > 300 feet is certainly not the limit. Particularly if you are running > 10base-T (rather than 100BT) Ethernet in an electrically quiet location > (like inside a piece of PVC garden pipe that you've buried in the > ground) it should be fine. I would recommend that you try this first, > with good quality Cat5E cable. It will probably work. If it doesn't, > there are VDSL-type Ethernet extenders that run 10 Mbps 5,000 feet or > more on a single pair, and you could add these on to the cable you > installed. If you are only extending a Direcway connection and not doing > high speed streaming between your two houses, an SDSL-type Ethernet > extender (www.netsys-direct.com for instance) will work. > > How is the Direcway working for you? What sort of upload and download > speeds do you actually get? > _______________________________________________ > Talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk > _______________________________________________ Talk mailing list [email protected] http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk