RE: Is Low-Cost Wi-Fi Un-American?
"Casey Halverson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.seattle.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
ART tried doing this as well. It was a cool idea, but you can barely make enough on metro fiber rings as it is. Also, microwave cannot even match the reliability and capacity. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ralph Sims > Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 9:10 AM > To: 'SeattleWireless Talk List' > Subject: RE: Is Low-Cost Wi-Fi Un-American? > > I think the infrastructure was somewhat limited by the range. > Winstar did OK in providing short-haul (1-3 mi.) links. > There was some "frequency reuse" by placing units > back-to-back to get a relay in place. Generally speaking it > was from a Winstar POP to a building a short distance away. > > They were marginally successful in getting service > established from their old POP at 109th & NE8th St. in > Bellevue to Seattle--just beyond the fringe of two nines of > reliability, if I recall. > > > ....not to mention that 38 gig allocations are a trash band. > > I guess one man's junk is another man's treasure. Too bad nearly > > every company who tried building infrastructure with that gear has > > failed. > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk > _______________________________________________ Talk mailing list [email protected] http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk