RE: Is Low-Cost Wi-Fi Un-American?

"Casey Halverson" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.wireless.seattle.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
ART tried doing this as well. It was a cool idea, but you can barely
make enough on metro fiber rings as it is.  Also, microwave cannot even
match the reliability and capacity.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ralph Sims
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 9:10 AM
> To: 'SeattleWireless Talk List'
> Subject: RE: Is Low-Cost Wi-Fi Un-American?
> 
> I think the infrastructure was somewhat limited by the range. 
>  Winstar did OK in providing short-haul (1-3 mi.) links.  
> There was some "frequency reuse" by placing units 
> back-to-back to get a relay in place.  Generally speaking it 
> was from a Winstar POP to a building a short distance away.
> 
> They were marginally successful in getting service 
> established from their old POP at 109th & NE8th St. in 
> Bellevue to Seattle--just beyond the fringe of two nines of 
> reliability, if I recall.
> 
> > ....not to mention that 38 gig allocations are a trash band.  
> > I guess one man's junk is another man's treasure.  Too bad nearly 
> > every company who tried building infrastructure with that gear has 
> > failed.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
> 
_______________________________________________
Talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.