Re: Is the OR500 better then the Senao NL-2611 CB3?
"Eddie " <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.seattle.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for all the suggestions and sorry for not getting back sooner. I have not had time for to play with this project. The AP has a few settings. Fragmentation threshold: 2346 RTS threshold: 2432 Beacon period:100 DTIM interval:1 Multicast PM buffering: (checked on) Preamble type: Long,Short,Both(Set to Long) Basic rates (Mbit/s): (All checked for 1M, 2M, 5.5M, 11M) Supported rates (Mbit/s): (All checked for 1M, 2M, 5.5M, 11M) Transmission rate (Mbits/s): Automatic What would be the suggested settings for my 9 mile link? I also picked up some used RoamAbout Outdoor. http://www.enterasys.com/products/wireless/RBTED-xx/ They use the same Orinoco cards, but says it supports 11Mbs with my 24dB antenns for up to 25 miles. Does the RoamAbout have some magic that the OR500 does not to get faster speed with the same radios? Thanks for all help. -Eddie On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:04:26 -0600, Tyler van Houwelingen wrote: >suggestions: > >1. Set the modulation rate on both ends from auto to 2Mbps or 1Mbps >2. Try horizontal polarization on the antennas >3. I would take a look at your number of packets being retransmitted - my >guess is that they are getting hammered somewhere along the way. If this is >the case, you can try other channels, but your best bet is to move the link >to 5GHz. Your packets can be hammered, even if you are seeing good RSSI >4. run DRTCP on each client should help (changing to higher Rwin settings >should help) > >tyler > > >Tyler van Houwelingen >CEO and Founder >Azulstar Networks, Inc. >1051 Jackson, Grand Haven, MI 49417 >1117 Rio Rancho Blvd 13, Rio Rancho, NM 87124 >1-877-AZULSTAR >www.azulstar.com >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Casey Halverson" <[email protected]> >To: "Eddie" <[email protected]>; "SeattleWireless Talk List" ><[email protected]> >Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 10:16 AM >Subject: RE: Is the OR500 better then the Senao NL-2611 CB3? > > >Could be due to timing issues (the orinoco bridges don't really have >this issue), or other settings that are different than the OR500's. >Keep in mind these were tuned to be wireless bridges, and your senao was >tuned to be a local LAN station. > >I would make sure the following is done on your new link: > >- Turn off ACK's >- Turn off retries >- Turn off flow control RTS/CTS >- Adjust fragmentation settings >- Turn off WEP > >Keep an eye on retries and lost packets. While you will see some, it >should not be excessive. > >I do not know whats available to you as far as statistics, but 70% does >not help us much. Please indicate the signal and noise levels in dBm. > >According to my calculations, assuming you had a clear path and radios >pretty close to the antenna, you should be coming in at -52.3dBm. This >is considerably stronger than you were before. You could have also >introduced some sort of multipath issue. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eddie >> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 5:20 PM >> To: SeattleWireless Talk List >> Subject: Is the OR500 better then the Senao NL-2611 CB3? >> >> Hello, >> >> I have a strange problem. Since I can't get DSL out in the >> sticks, I have a 9 mile wireless 802.11b link. I use a set of >> Orinoco OR500 wireless bridges and some 24db directional >> antennas. The system is far more complex (ask if you need >> more details), but the long link is the one I am trying to >> upgrade. Right now, I am getting 120- 130KBs over the long >> link. That is one FTP transfer. If I try to do two things at >> once, the OR500 slow way down. Sort of a one track mind >> thing. It's not perfect, but it's better then dial up and I >> have had zero problems with it over the year I have had it up. >> >> But I have a 3Mbs DSL line so I would like to upgrade the >> speed of the link. I picked up two Senao NL-2611 CB3. I set >> one to AP mode, and the other to client. >> Testing at home showed they peaked around 4.5Mbs. When I >> connected them to the antennas, it showed a 70% signal >> strength, but bandwidth maxes out at 30KBs. >> Changing the channel and messing with all the settings did nothing. >> >> Why would the higher power and better Senao have slower speeds? >> >> Thank you >> -Eddie >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk >> >_______________________________________________ >Talk mailing list >[email protected] >http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk > > >_______________________________________________ >Talk mailing list >[email protected] >http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ Talk mailing list [email protected] http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk