Re: Is the OR500 better then the Senao NL-2611 CB3?
"BarangayWireless.Net" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.wireless.seattle.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
try setting the fragementation threshold to 500 and see if it increase the speed. then tweak it to the best settings. i had once this problem with senao with only 10kBps max speed. but when i change it to fragmentation to 500 it significantly increase the speed to 60kBps On 5/17/05, Eddie <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for all the suggestions and sorry for not getting back sooner. I have not had time for to play with this project. > > The AP has a few settings. > > Fragmentation threshold: 2346 > RTS threshold: 2432 > Beacon period:100 > DTIM interval:1 > Multicast PM buffering: (checked on) > Preamble type: Long,Short,Both(Set to Long) > > Basic rates (Mbit/s): (All checked for 1M, 2M, 5.5M, 11M) > Supported rates (Mbit/s): (All checked for 1M, 2M, 5.5M, 11M) > Transmission rate (Mbits/s): Automatic > > What would be the suggested settings for my 9 mile link? > > I also picked up some used RoamAbout Outdoor. > http://www.enterasys.com/products/wireless/RBTED-xx/ > > They use the same Orinoco cards, but says it supports 11Mbs with my 24dB antenns for up to 25 miles. > Does the RoamAbout have some magic that the OR500 does not to get faster speed with the same radios? > > Thanks for all help. > -Eddie > > > On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:04:26 -0600, Tyler van Houwelingen wrote: > > >suggestions: > > > >1. Set the modulation rate on both ends from auto to 2Mbps or 1Mbps > >2. Try horizontal polarization on the antennas > >3. I would take a look at your number of packets being retransmitted - my > >guess is that they are getting hammered somewhere along the way. If this is > >the case, you can try other channels, but your best bet is to move the link > >to 5GHz. Your packets can be hammered, even if you are seeing good RSSI > >4. run DRTCP on each client should help (changing to higher Rwin settings > >should help) > > > >tyler > > > > > >Tyler van Houwelingen > >CEO and Founder > >Azulstar Networks, Inc. > >1051 Jackson, Grand Haven, MI 49417 > >1117 Rio Rancho Blvd 13, Rio Rancho, NM 87124 > >1-877-AZULSTAR > >www.azulstar.com > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Casey Halverson" <[email protected]> > >To: "Eddie" <[email protected]>; "SeattleWireless Talk List" > ><[email protected]> > >Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 10:16 AM > >Subject: RE: Is the OR500 better then the Senao NL-2611 CB3? > > > > > >Could be due to timing issues (the orinoco bridges don't really have > >this issue), or other settings that are different than the OR500's. > >Keep in mind these were tuned to be wireless bridges, and your senao was > >tuned to be a local LAN station. > > > >I would make sure the following is done on your new link: > > > >- Turn off ACK's > >- Turn off retries > >- Turn off flow control RTS/CTS > >- Adjust fragmentation settings > >- Turn off WEP > > > >Keep an eye on retries and lost packets. While you will see some, it > >should not be excessive. > > > >I do not know whats available to you as far as statistics, but 70% does > >not help us much. Please indicate the signal and noise levels in dBm. > > > >According to my calculations, assuming you had a clear path and radios > >pretty close to the antenna, you should be coming in at -52.3dBm. This > >is considerably stronger than you were before. You could have also > >introduced some sort of multipath issue. > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] > >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eddie > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 5:20 PM > >> To: SeattleWireless Talk List > >> Subject: Is the OR500 better then the Senao NL-2611 CB3? > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have a strange problem. Since I can't get DSL out in the > >> sticks, I have a 9 mile wireless 802.11b link. I use a set of > >> Orinoco OR500 wireless bridges and some 24db directional > >> antennas. The system is far more complex (ask if you need > >> more details), but the long link is the one I am trying to > >> upgrade. Right now, I am getting 120- 130KBs over the long > >> link. That is one FTP transfer. If I try to do two things at > >> once, the OR500 slow way down. Sort of a one track mind > >> thing. It's not perfect, but it's better then dial up and I > >> have had zero problems with it over the year I have had it up. > >> > >> But I have a 3Mbs DSL line so I would like to upgrade the > >> speed of the link. I picked up two Senao NL-2611 CB3. I set > >> one to AP mode, and the other to client. > >> Testing at home showed they peaked around 4.5Mbs. When I > >> connected them to the antennas, it showed a 70% signal > >> strength, but bandwidth maxes out at 30KBs. > >> Changing the channel and messing with all the settings did nothing. > >> > >> Why would the higher power and better Senao have slower speeds? > >> > >> Thank you > >> -Eddie > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Talk mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk > >> > >_______________________________________________ > >Talk mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Talk mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk > > _______________________________________________ > Talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk > -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Philippines WiFi enabled barangay http://BarangayWireless.net " who said internet is only for the city? " ----------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Talk mailing list [email protected] http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk