RE: Health Hazards

Todd Boyle <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.wireless.seattle.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On the other hand nobody has proven conclusively that microwave
is not harmful.  An idea gaining currency in Europe is that commercial
activities ought to proven safe by corporations rather than permitted
and approved, leaving the burden of proof on activists or institutions
to figure out later whether they were unsafe.  For instance see The
Genetic Takeover or "The Future of Food".

I happen to believe that wireless telecomm is so valuable it
overwhelms any side effects that are evident today.  But there
might be risks of cancer.  And there may be issues unrelated to
cancer.  The brain is an electro chemical engine.  If the operation
of the nervous system were affected, how would anybody prove it?

Finally, it is well established in psychology that biases can appear
in our thought processes as result of our occupation, our ingroup
we hang around with, and how the issues affect our pocketbook,
TOdd

At 06:50 AM 10/20/2005, you wrote:
>There have been an endless number of RF health-related studies over the
>years.  The short of it is that there has not been any creditable, peer
>reviewed, conclusive evidence showing that low power RF/microwave fields
>have any health effects.
>
>Do a search on dogpile.com or webcrawler.com, and you will find them.
>You will even find the RF radiation alarmists cherry picking an array of
>uncreditable and inconclusive studies over the years.  Don't believe
>everything you read on the internet.
>
>Science tells us that this is impossible, and to discover otherwise (and
>prove it) would shake the very foundation of physics as we know it.
>This would be something drastic along the lines of apples falling up
>into the sky, instead of from a tree to the ground.
>
>RF is non-ionizing radiation.  As scary as the word "radiation" sounds,
>it is not the nuclear/glowing kind.  The energy is just converted to
>heat when it passes through matter, like you and I, and perhaps a
>chicken.
>
>Generally, the heating effects from a 30mW wifi card, or even a 1 watt
>cellular phone, are non-existent.  A ray of sunlight will heat your body
>many times more than RF ever could.  Have you ever heard of a 1 watt
>microwave oven?  Probably not.  How about a 700 watt microwave oven?
>Sure...even though they cook like crap.  It takes a LOT of RF energy to
>heat things.
>
>It is well understood that high levels of RF exposure can cause health
>effects...like burns, etc.  Put your head into a microwave oven and you
>could possibly experience the health effects of RF radiation.  I would
>not suggest it though...
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected]
>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of MOHAMED-RASHEED
>Tinku RD-CORE-LAN
>Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 5:24 AM
>To: SeattleWireless Talk List
>Subject: Health Hazards
>
>  Hello,
>
>I would like to ask a slightly different question but perhaps very
>important too.
>
>Anyone got information about the health hazards imposed by the WLAN
>network subject to prolonged usage. Is there any authentic
>study/research on this aspect.
>
>Cheers,
>
>TMR
>_______________________________________________
>Talk mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
>_______________________________________________
>Talk mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk

_______________________________________________
Talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://seattlewireless.net/mailman/listinfo/talk
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.